I do believe that even making distinctions between traditional and non-traditional arts has limited use. After all BJJ is a descendant of Kodokan Judo (Called Kano Jui-Jitsu back then). I agree that comparing styles without context is practically useless.

There are ground fighting heavy styles of silat, for example, because combat was done on muddy slopes in that particular region and standing was difficult. Different context – different tactics.

It is interesting to note that the U.S. Army, after interviewing over 900 soldiers involved in hand to hand combat in Iraq and Afghanistan, has decided to de-emphasize ground fighting in its combatives curriculum. They are being smart and matching the tactics to the mission and the environment.

it’s good to know that ground fighting isn’t everything, and that standing up is a much better option that getting down and dirty(if you know what i mean?) i don’t mean to bash any one MA, but this reminds me of the guys who argue that BJJ is the best art, because fights almost always go to the ground. a friend of mine who does BJJ got into a fight, and whilst he was trying to put one guy into a submission, another guy came with a bottle and almost planted his face into the concrete.

that’s when he admitted infront of us, that BJJ is very useful agianst one opponent, and better in MMA, but less effective on the street where there could be multiple opponents. btw, i do TKD and Hapkido.

my 2c